|
|
GOOSE GOSSAGE HALL OF FAME OR SITT (OR BOTH)??? Rich Gossage was a dominant pitcher when he took the mound, there is no question. But was he dominant among his peers?? Was he good enough for Hall of Fame induction?? Personally, I think he has the credentials but Im not a sportswriter with a vote. I will leave the discussion and debate to the never-ending hot stove league and our Diamond Angle readers. But membership in SITT? No question!! Lets look at him by the numbers:
Goose compares favorably with two other pseuedo contemporaries Jeff Reardon (79 94) and Bruce Sutter (76 88). I say pseudo because neither covered the same 22 years that Goose did. While the two of them may have a better chance at HOF selection (with Reardon perhaps having the edge because of 367 saves compared to Sutters 300 saves), Goose can hold his own with Reardon in that all important total points (total team wins) category: Reardon: 367 saves plus 73 wins = 440 points Gossage: 310 saves plus 124 wins = 434 points Who else do you compare to him during his tenure: Al Hrabosky, Tug McGraw, Dan Quisenberry, Willie Hernendez, Rawley Eastwick, Dave Righetti, Kent Tukulve??? I dont think so!! None had the sustained performance Goose did over the '70s, '80s and part of the '90s. Come on! The guy was big and his moustache was bigger! He was a mad Hungairan before Hrabosky knew what that meant! And let's not forget he was the closer on those '78 World Series, '80 AL East and '81 AL pennant championship Yankee teams. In closing, Goose has the stats and longevity to warrant serious HOF consideration. I met him at a buddys hobby shop this summer and he is a true gentleman. When asked about whether he felt stress when he thought about his chances for induction into Cooperstown, his response was that stress is facing George Brett with the game on the line. I think Goose is satisfied to let his career performance speak for itself; and I think it shouts loud and clear. Leave feedback on our message board. |