Texas Rangers 2003 Season Previewby David Marasco
Yes, he made $22M last year. On the other hand, if Barry hadn't been wearing the red cape
and blue tights for the past two years we would be talking about A-Rod's bat. The man had
57 homers from the shortstop position last season. People will boo Bonds, but say it's due
to his perceived personality rather than his $15M salary. Yet A-Rod is supposedly ruining both
baseball and the Rangers. The claim is that A-Rod's salary cripples the Rangers, not allowing
them the room to sign other strong players. But let's contrast Bonds' National League Champion
Giants to A-Rod's 90-loss Rangers. Here are the players who made more than $5M on each squad:
The first thing to note here is that A-Rod's contract didn't keep the Rangers from having seven other players on the roster making over $5M. Robb Nen, the second-highest paid Giant, would be the sixth-highest paid Ranger. But more important than just salary is the return on investment. Both Bonds and A-Rod are expensive propositions, but heck, both deliver with their bats. Let's look at how the Giants' big-ticket players paid off. Bonds, obviously, earned his money. Robb Nen was fifth in the league with 43 saves, and is considered to be a top closer. Jeff Kent finished sixth in the MVP voting and provided Hall-of-Fame pop from the second base position. J.T. Snow posted a 246/344/360 line, pretty miserable for a $6M first baseman. Rounding things out, Rich Aurilia also disappointed, regressing to the mean following his outstanding 2001. The Giants big investments turned out two superstars, a front-line closer, and two guys the GM has to wonder about. Granted you want every investment to pay off, but the Giants seem to have done pretty well.
Now let's look at the Rangers. Again, A-Rod lives up to his money. Juan Gonzalez played only
70 games, and posted a park-adjusted OPS below league average. Pudge played in only 100 games
behind the plate, but was able to give the Rangers the tenth-highest slugging percentage in the
league, combined with league-average OBP. Rafael Palmeiro turned in another
great year late in the career. How good? Try a league-sixth .571 slugging percentage and
league-ninth .391 OBP. On the other hand you have Carl Everett, who had only 374 AB and
couldn't get to league average OPS+ in that limited time. Kenny Rogers went 13-8, posting a
3.84 ERA in 211 IP. Given the league average ERA of 4.91, Rogers' ERA doesn't look too bad.
Not what you would want from the highest-paid pitcher on your staff, but not bad. Compare those
numbers to Chan Ho Parks' 5.75 ERA over only 145 IP, for a 9-8 record. Rusty Greer rounds this
crowd out just shy of 200AB, yet another player not getting his head above league-average. So
in the Rangers group of eight, we have one superstar, two frontline position players (although
I-Rod's games played was not up to par), a solid pitcher, a less-than-solid pitcher and three
wasted roster slots. Worried about A-Rod's $22M? Add up Gonzalez, Everett and Greer and you
get $26.5M. Compare these two lines:
Of course, A-Rod is producing these numbers from shortstop, while these other people are playing in traditional batting slots: corner outfield, first and DH. Granted that every team has contracts that they regret, but the Rangers have lots of sunk costs in terms of bad contracts. Looking at last year's salaries, the Rangers no longer have Kenny Rogers. Sadly, that was one of the better big-money investments. Same with Pudge, his salary is no longer on the roster, but he wasn't one of the black holes. Einar Diaz won't earn the money, but won't fill his shoes. Juan Gonzalez will hopefully bounce back from his thumb injury, but who knows what runs through Everett's head? Chan Ho Park is pencilled in at the top of the rotation, but you have to wonder about a team that makes that statement. A cheap investment, Mark Teixeira, might make big waves in the Rangers' future. But of course, for years to come, the big name will be Alex Rodriguez. Photo Albums Texas Rangers II Texas Rangers I 2002 Preview 2001 Preview Leave feedback on our message board. |